点评:I paid to park at a carpark called Riverside, using the Ringo app, as offered as a way of payment by the signage. Little did I know that I was paying for a car park 500 meters away, and the closest car park on the map, called Riverside, and not Riverside *Car Park*, where I was actually parked. Confused yet? To help, I have attached a picture of these car parks on a map. They're next to each other, both car parks called Riverside, but apparently Minster Baywatch think they've covered themselves with "clear signage", despite on that sign saying "use RingGo", which will offer a customer both Riverside and Riverside car park, due to the apps location functionality! If the sign they use to advertise parking says "use RingGo", when Ringo then offer you the nearest car parks, and both car parks are called "Riverside", then clearly you can't then selectively decide to disown RingGo, because it conveniently justifies why you're suddenly owed £100. I actually paid more to park at Riverside than I would have at Riverside car park (yeah, I understand this post is confusing!).
I'm not paying the fine, as it's clear their sign advertises an app that invalidates the "clear signage" T's&Cs. If they choose to name their car park the same name as the closest car park on the map, that also uses RingGo, then they're liable for the blatantly obvious confusion that will cause.
Such a silly dispute.
翻译:我使用 Ringo 应用程序在一个名为 Riverside 的停车场付费,这是标牌上提供的一种付款方式。我几乎不知道我支付的费用是 500 米外的停车场,以及地图上最近的停车场,称为 Riverside,而不是我实际停车的 Riverside *停车场*。还困惑吗?为了提供帮助,我在地图上附上了这些停车场的图片。它们彼此相邻,两个停车场都称为 Riverside,但显然 Minster Baywatch 认为他们已经用“清晰的标牌”覆盖了自己,尽管标牌上写着“使用 RingGo”,这将为客户提供 Riverside 和 Riverside 汽车公园,由于应用程序的定位功能!如果他们用来广告停车的标牌上写着“使用 RingGo”,那么当 Ringo 为您提供最近的停车场时,并且两个停车场都被称为“Riverside”,那么显然您不能选择性地决定与 RingGo 断绝关系,因为这很方便证明为什么突然欠你 100 英镑。实际上,我在河滨停车的费用比在河滨停车场支付的费用还要高(是的,我知道这篇文章令人困惑!)。
我不会支付罚款,因为很明显他们的标牌宣传的应用程序使“清晰标牌”的条款和条件无效。如果他们选择将自己的停车场命名为与地图上最近的停车场相同的名称(也使用 RingGo),那么他们就要对由此造成的明显混乱负责。
这么愚蠢的争论。