点评:Photo used in marketing is misleading - it is more of a zoo with some gardens dotted around. Buildings which house some of the animals appear to be poorly maintained (reptile area buildings for example) and very dirty and in good need of a wash / lick of paint. Some of the windows are so dirty (where some of the birds are kept) you can barely see which species are housed there. Some of the conditions for the animals looked very poor when you compare to other zoos around the world. The elephants for example just stood shaking their heads from side to side - quite sad to see. The tigers and bears (all the larger animals) didn't really seem to have enough space either or adequate stimulation. Some of the Iguana houses for example looked really over crowded with so many of them in the one area. Its is very cheap to get into the zoo / gardens so maybe they could increase the prices and reinvest some of the money into improving the conditions
翻译:营销中使用的照片具有误导性——它更像是一个动物园,周围散布着一些花园。饲养一些动物的建筑物似乎维护不善(例如爬行动物区建筑物),而且非常脏,需要清洗/刷油漆。一些窗户太脏了(饲养一些鸟类的地方),你几乎看不清那里饲养着哪些物种。与世界各地的其他动物园相比,这些动物的生存条件看起来非常糟糕。例如,大象只是站在那里摇头——这很令人难过。老虎和熊(所有较大的动物)似乎也没有足够的空间或足够的刺激。例如,一些鬣蜥屋看起来真的过于拥挤,一个区域里有这么多鬣蜥。进入动物园/花园非常便宜,所以也许他们可以提高价格,并将部分资金重新投资用于改善条件