下载App
旅行
账户
Costelloclan2018
Saas-Fee: Premium Prices, Reduced Ski Area, Poor Value
Saas-Fee Ski Resort的点评
点评：Saas-Fee: Premium Prices, Reduced Ski Area, Poor Value
Saas-Fee markets itself as a world-class, snow-reliable resort and charges accordingly. Unfortunately, the reality on the mountain does not match the price.
During my stay, a large number of lifts and pistes were closed despite being clearly skiable. Beginner terrain in particular was poorly served, with key areas remaining shut while guests were funnelled into limited zones. This made progression difficult and the overall ski experience frustrating — especially for families and less confident skiers.
Management insists closures are purely safety-based, yet multiple lifts were opened later without any new snowfall, strongly suggesting decisions are driven by economics rather than conditions. Charging full lift-pass prices while delivering a significantly reduced product feels disingenuous.
More concerning is the long-term trend: Saas-Fee has quietly lost skiable terrain over the years, with little visible effort to replace or recover it, while prices remain firmly at the premium end.
The scenery is spectacular and the village charming, but natural beauty alone does not justify the cost. Until lift operations, beginner access, and transparency improve, Saas-Fee represents poor value compared with many other Alpine resorts.
Verdict: Stunning setting, disappointing execution. Not worth the price unless the full ski area is genuinely open.
Saas-Fee markets itself as a world-class, snow-reliable resort and charges accordingly. Unfortunately, the reality on the mountain does not match the price.
During my stay, a large number of lifts and pistes were closed despite being clearly skiable. Beginner terrain in particular was poorly served, with key areas remaining shut while guests were funnelled into limited zones. This made progression difficult and the overall ski experience frustrating — especially for families and less confident skiers.
Management insists closures are purely safety-based, yet multiple lifts were opened later without any new snowfall, strongly suggesting decisions are driven by economics rather than conditions. Charging full lift-pass prices while delivering a significantly reduced product feels disingenuous.
More concerning is the long-term trend: Saas-Fee has quietly lost skiable terrain over the years, with little visible effort to replace or recover it, while prices remain firmly at the premium end.
The scenery is spectacular and the village charming, but natural beauty alone does not justify the cost. Until lift operations, beginner access, and transparency improve, Saas-Fee represents poor value compared with many other Alpine resorts.
Verdict: Stunning setting, disappointing execution. Not worth the price unless the full ski area is genuinely open.
翻译：萨斯费：高价、雪场缩减、性价比低
萨斯费一直标榜自己是世界一流、雪况稳定的度假胜地，并收取相应的费用。然而，实际情况却与价格不符。
在我入住期间，许多缆车和雪道明明可以滑雪，却都被关闭了。尤其是初学者区域，服务非常糟糕，关键区域仍然关闭，而游客只能被引导到有限的区域内。这使得滑雪者难以进步，整体滑雪体验也令人沮丧——尤其是对于家庭和滑雪经验不足的滑雪者而言。
管理层坚称关闭区域完全是出于安全考虑，但之后却在没有新雪的情况下重新开放了多条缆车，这强烈暗示他们的决策是出于经济利益而非雪况考虑。收取全价缆车票，却提供大幅缩水的服务，这种做法令人感到虚伪。
更令人担忧的是长期趋势：多年来，萨斯费的可滑雪区域一直在悄然减少，却几乎没有采取任何措施来弥补或恢复这些区域，而价格却依然居高不下。
风景壮丽，村庄迷人，但仅凭自然美景不足以支撑如此高昂的价格。除非缆车运营、初学者通道以及透明度有所改善，否则与其他许多阿尔卑斯山度假胜地相比，萨斯费的性价比并不高。
结论：景色绝美，但体验令人失望。除非整个滑雪区真正开放，否则不值这个价。
萨斯费一直标榜自己是世界一流、雪况稳定的度假胜地，并收取相应的费用。然而，实际情况却与价格不符。
在我入住期间，许多缆车和雪道明明可以滑雪，却都被关闭了。尤其是初学者区域，服务非常糟糕，关键区域仍然关闭，而游客只能被引导到有限的区域内。这使得滑雪者难以进步，整体滑雪体验也令人沮丧——尤其是对于家庭和滑雪经验不足的滑雪者而言。
管理层坚称关闭区域完全是出于安全考虑，但之后却在没有新雪的情况下重新开放了多条缆车，这强烈暗示他们的决策是出于经济利益而非雪况考虑。收取全价缆车票，却提供大幅缩水的服务，这种做法令人感到虚伪。
更令人担忧的是长期趋势：多年来，萨斯费的可滑雪区域一直在悄然减少，却几乎没有采取任何措施来弥补或恢复这些区域，而价格却依然居高不下。
风景壮丽，村庄迷人，但仅凭自然美景不足以支撑如此高昂的价格。除非缆车运营、初学者通道以及透明度有所改善，否则与其他许多阿尔卑斯山度假胜地相比，萨斯费的性价比并不高。
结论：景色绝美，但体验令人失望。除非整个滑雪区真正开放，否则不值这个价。
© 2026 Tripadvisor 版权所有。
部分照片由 VFM Leonardo 提供。
TripAdvisor公司对外部网站的内容一概不负责。优惠价格中不含税和其他费用。
ICP证：沪B2-20200433
沪ICP备20013175号
沪公网安备31010502005427号鹰程信息技术（上海）有限公司
