点评:I was disappointed by the inconsistent enforcement of the venue's policy. Because of the extreme heat, l became dizzy and needed a plain bottle of water. My husband explained this, yet a security officer stopped me, repeatedly referred to my water as a "beverage," and told me I had to drink it immediately because I could not take it through the gate.
My husband and I were wearing motorcycle-club support gear. However, the group directly in front of us, who were dressed in regular everyday clothing, was permitted to walk through the same gate carrying bottled waters and sodas. My husband took photos clearly showing them outside the gate with those drinks.
The difference in how we were treated was obvious and gave us the strong impression that we were singled out because of what we were wearing. If guests are prohibited from leaving with beverages, that policy should be communicated clearly and enforced equally-not selectively based on clothing or perceived affiliation.
Applying the rules differently, especially when someone is experiencing heat-related dizziness, is concerning and unacceptable.
翻译:场地方面政策执行的不一致性让我很失望。由于天气极其炎热,我头晕目眩,需要一瓶纯水来解渴。我丈夫向安保人员说明了情况,但一名保安还是拦住了我,反复把我的水称作“饮料”,还告诉我必须马上喝掉,因为不能带着水进入场馆。
我和丈夫当时穿着摩托车俱乐部的应援服。然而,就在我们正前方的那群人……那些穿着普通日常服装的人也被允许带着瓶装水和汽水从同一大门进出。我的丈夫拍下了他们带着饮料站在大门外的照片。
我们受到的待遇差异显而易见,这让我们强烈感觉到,我们之所以被特别对待,就是因为我们穿的衣服。如果禁止宾客携带饮料离开的话,该政策应当清晰传达并平等执行——不得基于着装或表面上的身份归属而区别对待。
对规则采取双重标准,尤其是在有人因高温出现头晕症状时,这种行为令人担忧且不可接受。