点评:My disabled adult son, his caregiver, his service dog and I visited in the afternoon during the week. We were denied public accommodations for the service animal which is against ADA and Colorado revised statute 24-34-804. when having a conversation with the Executive Director around how they were in direct violation of ADA "People with disabilities who use service animals cannot be isolated from other patrons, treated less favorably than other patrons, or charged fees that are not charged to other patrons without animals." She flippantly replied to report her. The dog was not on the carousel but waiting for my son in the same area (behind the gate) as other patrons who were waiting for their people. We were told the dog could not be there because of "the crowd". If you happen to have a service dog trained to assist you, do your diligence in researching reviews for this establishment. Ours was not a unique experience.
翻译:我和我那位残疾的成年儿子、他的看护人以及他的服务犬,在工作日下午去了那里。我们被拒绝为服务性动物提供公共场所,这违反了《美国残疾人法案》(ADA) 和科罗拉多州修订法规 24-34-804。我与执行董事讨论他们如何直接违反了《美国残疾人法案》(ADA) 时,执行董事轻率地回复说:“使用服务性动物的残疾人不能与其他顾客隔离,不能受到比其他顾客更差的待遇,也不能收取不带动物的其他顾客不收取的费用。” 她轻率地回复说要举报她。那只狗不在旋转木马上,而是和其他等候他们的顾客在同一个区域(大门后)等我儿子。我们被告知,由于“人群拥挤”,狗不能在那里。如果您恰好有一只受过训练的服务犬来协助您,请尽职尽责地查阅这家机构的评论。我们的经历并非个例。