下载App
旅行
账户
Matthew J
Does *Not* Beat The Tube
Elizabeth Line by TfL的点评
点评：I used the Elizabeth Line to get between Woolwich and Central London. I hadn't used the Elizabeth Line before but had heard good things about it.
The first thing to note is that this is *NOT* a London Underground line. It's name is misleading because it is actually part of the National Rail system, a bit like the London Overground is.
On the plus side, the trains are very clean and well-kept and nicely presented. They are also very spacious and have plenty of carriages, and compared to train services in other parts of the UK (ie. the North), they are very frequent.
However, if you can look past the grandeur of the trains and stations, you realise that the Elizabeth Line is nowhere near as efficient as the London Underground. When using the Underground, it does not matter if you miss a train, 99% of the time it doesn't matter as the next one is usually under 5 minutes away. This is not the case on the Elizabeth Line. Also, whilst on the map, it seems like a quicker way to get across the city, the gaps between the stations are quite large so I think it's quicker to use the tube if you're going a short distance.
The on-board announcements are also poor and less informative compared to the ones on the tube trains.
As a result, this might be a good train system to use long-distance but keep in mind that it does not share the efficiency of the London Underground.
The first thing to note is that this is *NOT* a London Underground line. It's name is misleading because it is actually part of the National Rail system, a bit like the London Overground is.
On the plus side, the trains are very clean and well-kept and nicely presented. They are also very spacious and have plenty of carriages, and compared to train services in other parts of the UK (ie. the North), they are very frequent.
However, if you can look past the grandeur of the trains and stations, you realise that the Elizabeth Line is nowhere near as efficient as the London Underground. When using the Underground, it does not matter if you miss a train, 99% of the time it doesn't matter as the next one is usually under 5 minutes away. This is not the case on the Elizabeth Line. Also, whilst on the map, it seems like a quicker way to get across the city, the gaps between the stations are quite large so I think it's quicker to use the tube if you're going a short distance.
The on-board announcements are also poor and less informative compared to the ones on the tube trains.
As a result, this might be a good train system to use long-distance but keep in mind that it does not share the efficiency of the London Underground.
翻译：我乘坐伊丽莎白线往返于伍尔维奇和伦敦市中心之间。我之前没坐过伊丽莎白线，但听说过它不错。
首先要注意的是，这*不是*一条伦敦地铁线。它的名字容易让人误解，因为它实际上是英国国家铁路系统的一部分，有点像伦敦地上铁。
优点是，列车非常干净、保养良好，而且外观漂亮。它们也非常宽敞，车厢充足，而且与英国其他地区（例如北部地区）的列车服务相比，它们的班次非常频繁。
然而，如果你能忽略列车和车站的宏伟，就会发现伊丽莎白线的效率远不及伦敦地铁。乘坐地铁时，错过一班火车也没关系，99% 的情况下都无所谓，因为下一班火车通常在 5 分钟之内就能到。但伊丽莎白线的情况并非如此。另外，虽然在地图上看起来这是一种更快捷的穿越城市的方式，但车站之间的间隔很大，所以我觉得如果只是短途旅行，乘坐地铁会更快。
车上的广播也很差，信息量也比地铁列车少。
因此，这可能是一个适合长途旅行的列车系统，但请记住，它不如伦敦地铁那么高效。
首先要注意的是，这*不是*一条伦敦地铁线。它的名字容易让人误解，因为它实际上是英国国家铁路系统的一部分，有点像伦敦地上铁。
优点是，列车非常干净、保养良好，而且外观漂亮。它们也非常宽敞，车厢充足，而且与英国其他地区（例如北部地区）的列车服务相比，它们的班次非常频繁。
然而，如果你能忽略列车和车站的宏伟，就会发现伊丽莎白线的效率远不及伦敦地铁。乘坐地铁时，错过一班火车也没关系，99% 的情况下都无所谓，因为下一班火车通常在 5 分钟之内就能到。但伊丽莎白线的情况并非如此。另外，虽然在地图上看起来这是一种更快捷的穿越城市的方式，但车站之间的间隔很大，所以我觉得如果只是短途旅行，乘坐地铁会更快。
车上的广播也很差，信息量也比地铁列车少。
因此，这可能是一个适合长途旅行的列车系统，但请记住，它不如伦敦地铁那么高效。
© 2026 Tripadvisor 版权所有。
部分照片由 VFM Leonardo 提供。
TripAdvisor公司对外部网站的内容一概不负责。优惠价格中不含税和其他费用。
ICP证：沪B2-20200433
沪ICP备20013175号
沪公网安备31010502005427号鹰程信息技术（上海）有限公司
